Mozart's compositional method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Revert to revision 1003453568 dated 2021-01-29 01:45:00 by FeanorStar7: was correct.
Jbricklin (talk | contribs)
The Rochlitz letter: Improved continuity
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 111:
<blockquote>Mozart wrote everything with a facility and rapidity, which perhaps at first sight could appear as carelessness or haste; and while writing he never came to the klavier. His imagination presented the whole work, when it came to him, clearly and vividly. ... In the quiet repose of the night, when no obstacle hindered his soul, the power of his imagination became incandescent with the most animated activity, and unfolded all the wealth of tone which nature had placed in his spirit ... Only the person who heard Mozart at such times knows the depth and the whole range of his musical genius: free and independent of all concern his spirit could soar in daring flight to the highest regions of art.<ref>Niemetschek, pp. 54–55</ref></blockquote>
 
TheMoreover, the contents of the Rochlitz letter were relayed by such authorities as the mathematician [[Henri Poincaré]] and the musician [[Albert Lavignac]]<ref>Albert Lavignac, ''L'éducation musicale'', p. 290</ref> and had a great influence on the popular view of Mozart's compositional process. AsAnd even as late as 1952 a volume of collected papers from a symposium on the creative process reproduce the letter, albeit with a warning that "the authenticity of this letter remains in doubt".<ref>Brewster Ghiseli (editor), ''The Creative Process: A Symposium'', University of California Press, 1952, p. 34</ref>
 
==Notes==