Content deleted Content added
"et" changed to "and" in Table 1. Probably a copy-paste slip up from a French version. |
Linked to existing Procrustes analysis article |
||
Line 188:
The small size and simplicity of the example allow simple validation of the rules of interpretation. But the method will be more valuable when the data set is large and complex.
Other methods suitable for this type of data are available. [[Procrustes analysis]] is compared to the MFA in.<ref>Pagès Jérôme (2014). Multiple Factor Analysis by Example Using R. Chapman & Hall/CRC The R Series, London. 272p</ref>
== History ==
| |||