Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
(CA)Giacobbe (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 42:
==Genres==
{{Ping|(CA)Giacobbe}} I can't believe I have to explain why sourced genres should be included in the infobox. There are two sources for experimental and one source for pop, rock, and electropop. That's not a big difference. I say we list experimental first and the three genres after that. Why is that such a big problem? [[User:Bowling is life|Bowling is life]] ([[User talk:Bowling is life|talk]]) 00:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
:{{Ping|(CA)Giacobbe}} Thank you for taking it to the talk page, I honestly appreciate your dedication to the article and I'd much rather have a constructive dialogue and be able to talk this out. There are four sources that deem it experimental. If we include Fitzmaurice's review (one critic's opinion), then we'd also have to include [https://theface.com/music/the-1975-takeover-matty-healy-interview-notes-on-a-conditional-form?token=724 synth-pop, techno, indie-pop, folk], [https://uproxx.com/critic-polls/the-2020-uproxx-music-critics-poll/ art rock, nu metal, folk, jungle, Britpop], [https://barricademagazine.com/rail/strongreview-the-1975-emnotes-on-a-conditional-formemstrongemnbspem lo-fi house, rock, ambient music], etc., since those all have at least one source. I'd be happy to work with you and find more sources to build a consensus, but I'm sure you can see the issue with giving undue weight to one reviewer. This album is stylistically all over the place (and the reviews reflect that, lol). '''[[User:(CA)Giacobbe|<font color="3399FF" size=3px>Gia</font><font color="FF66CC" size=3px>co</font><font color="3399FF" size=3px>bbe</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:(CA)Giacobbe|<font color="#FF66CC">talk</font>]]</sup> 00:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||