Revision as of 08:29, 6 April 2021 edit 17387349L8764 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,707 edits →section "Tool types" is not specific to static analysis: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:31, 6 April 2021 edit undo 17387349L8764 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,707 edits →Outdated studies in the Rationale section: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 72: There are studies referenced in the Rationale section from 2012 and 2010. I'm sure these were added when those studies were released, but it seems pretty outdated for this article now (and irrelevant at this point?). Should these be removed altogether? Reworded? Would love to hear others' input. [[User:Metromemo\|Metromemo]] ([[User talk:Metromemo\|talk]]) 20:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC) :On a deeper look, this entire article could use some updating. The most recent reference is from 2015 and most are older than that. [[User:Metromemo\|Metromemo]] ([[User talk:Metromemo\|talk]]) 20:52, 16 September 2020 (UTC) ::Complete article needs updating. Old references are usually Ok if they are major papers. Some papers are just "leaps", but of course there are newer documents on SCA meanwhile looking across IEEE, Elsevier, etc. sources. --[[User:17387349L8764\|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764\|talk]]) 08:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Static program analysis: Difference between revisions