Content deleted Content added
The notion of "dynamically creating functions" is grossly inaccurate. |
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m 74.128.168.38 didn't sign: "The notion of "dynamically creating functions" is grossly inaccurate." |
||
Line 15:
Of course, removing this "requirement" from the list also means that C DOES have first class functions. If you don't agree with this, I'd recommend including closures as mentioned (which, IMO, are a somewhat different beast), and perhaps anonymous functions as well.
I'd make these changes myself but I don't want to so majorly overhaul this node without some further input. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/74.128.168.38|74.128.168.38]] ([[User talk:74.128.168.38|talk]]) 22:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
| |||