Content deleted Content added
→Some Proposed Changes: new section |
|||
Line 28:
The lead mentions many are opposed to it's passage in other states but does not mention why. We should expand the article to include a section that deals with who supports the this uniform law and who is against it and why. What are the controversial provisions of the law that critics object too. I read also that some backers of the UCITA tried removing certain more controversial provisions to get the law passed in certain states but without success so far. The self-help provision was mentioned as one such provision removed to try and get the law passed. The article should be expanded to explain the major provisions in the act and how they would or did (in the two states who've already passed it) changed existing law. Specific critics of this model law should be mentioned by name and efforts in specific state that prevented passage of the law should be mentioned. --[[User:Notcharliechaplin|Notcharliechaplin]] ([[User talk:Notcharliechaplin|talk]]) 20:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
== Some Proposed Changes ==
Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
{{request edit}}
Add to third paragraph in lede: "UCITA has faced severe opposition from various groups." '''There have been concerns regarding the "one size fits all" approach of the UCITA, the UCITA's favoring of software manufacturers, and the UCTITA's deference to new industry standards.'''<ref>{{cite journal |last1=O'Rourke |first1=Maureen |title=Progressing Towards a Uniform Commercial Code for Electronic Commerce or Racing Towards Nonuniformity |journal=Berkley Technology Law Journal |date=2000 |volume=14 |pages=647-651}}</ref> '''Some of the other criticisms regarding the adoption of the UCITA include the inclusion of self-help provisions included in the UCITA, which first existed in a limited form in the first version of the UCITA and was later prohibited.'' <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hillman |first1=Robert |last2=O'Rourke |first2=Maureen |title=Defending Disclosure in Software Licensing |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=78 |date=2011 |pages=111 |url=https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/881/}}</ref>
[[User:Cf2022|Cf2022]] ([[User talk:Cf2022|talk]]) 02:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Cf2022
| |||