Revision as of 11:42, 13 April 2021 edit Uncle G (talk \| contribs) Administrators 54,258 edits A note. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:45, 14 April 2021 edit undo Johnpacklambert (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 627,748 edits →One-pass algorithm Next edit →
Line 12: ***Knuth points out that it's a vague concept, and treats both together. Enjoy. Volume 1, of course. [[User:Uncle G\|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G\|talk]]) 11:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC) '''Speedy keep''', the nominator does not propose a valid [[WP:DEL-REASON]]. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. [[User:SailingInABathTub\|SailingInABathTub]] ([[User talk:SailingInABathTub\|talk]]) 10:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC) *'''Comment''' No valid reason given for speedy keeping. The article only has one listed source. This article as it stands does not pass GNG, although it may well be possible to add enough sourcing to pass that. We should never speedy keep articles that do not as they are written pass GNG.[[User:Johnpacklambert\|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert\|talk]]) 13:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-pass algorithm: Difference between revisions