Content deleted Content added
Line 59:
P.S. See [[WP:Bombard]]. Spamming a ton of poor sources into an article is not a successful way to keep it from being deleted. In fact including too many poor sources can backfire. If a reviewer checks half the refs and find none of them are good enough to support [[WP:N|Notability]], they may conclude the other half are equally useless and vote delete. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 21:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
:It is now April 2021, and even though the two latest delete-nominations ended with keep, the article itself still doesn't convey notability. With only a handful of exceptions, the more than 50 inline references are either primary sources or GitHub repos. The only exception, other than two YouTube videos and events where Nim was talked about, is an ''InfoWorld'' article! The only reason I think it may have some notability is that apparently it has enough fanpeeps to get this huge article, that's full of excessive details, into Wikipedia... --[[Special:Contributions/143.176.30.65|143.176.30.65]] ([[User talk:143.176.30.65|talk]]) 13:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
:And if you look at the latest delete-nomination discussion, the only additional refs that people could find are either websites discussing Nim reaching version 1.0, or non-reliable sources. --[[Special:Contributions/143.176.30.65|143.176.30.65]] ([[User talk:143.176.30.65|talk]]) 13:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
| |||