Content deleted Content added
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account is being used only for spam or advertising and your username is a violation of the username policy.
No edit summary
Line 107:
:*Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
'''Appeals:''' If, after reviewing the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], you believe this block was made in error, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal it]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. [[User:Orangemike|<span style="color:#F80">Orange Mike</span>]] &#124; [[User talk:Orangemike|<span style="color:#FA0">Talk</span>]] 18:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)</div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names|{{PAGENAME}}]]{{z17}}<!-- Template:Uw-spamublock -->
 
== April 23 2021 ==
{{unblock|I would be happy to change my user name if that is your problem. I am an academic working for a non-profit educational organization. Wikipedia has become a truly hostile place for academics. Just tell me what you want me to do. I am an expert on Computational Thinking. The quality of some of the articles related to Computational Thinking in Wikipedia is becoming quite alarming. Why would Wikipedia be more concerned about the name of users rather than the quality of articles? I have never pushed ideas that were not backed up by peer reviewed academic articles}}