Content deleted Content added
m | |
|||
Line 119:
Respectfully, I disagree and find your actions off-putting. If you subscribe to [[Wikipedia:Relationships_with_academic_editors]] you would not just delete content but engage authors in a discussion. You're suggesting to get help from Wikipedia editors knowledgable in the topic. If you are knowledgable in the topic please help me. If you are not, how would you know if my contribution adds to the overall quality or not? I have edited the article many times as a whole only to see my contributions getting fragmented again by others. This is a tedious process that has not added up to quality article. It takes at least two to engage in warring. Maybe you could look at the model outlined in the characterization. You should notice that this is a 1:1 alignment to the seminal Wing paper.Feel free to make this connection more explicit if you want. Thank you for your support. [[User talk:Dragentsheets]], 23 April 2021 (UTC)
: I, first and foremost, adhered to the [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BOLD, revert, discuss cycle]]. Following this first revert, there would have been ample time for you to discuss. I initially did not start a discussion since the edits were several years old and I was not expecting a response—though hoping that you would initiate one if you are still active on the platform (which, of course, has not happened). However, you decided to force your changes back into the article (three times) without discussion, thereby initiating the "edit war". I have been with Wikipedia long enough and have sufficient general knowledge in computer science that I can identify potentially unhelpful content, even without in-depth knowledge of this particular topic. After all, articles are meant for people with rather little knowledge. [[Wikipedia:Relationships with academic editors]] (which is an essay, not a policy) actually suggests that "edits that breach policy should be reverted". Now that we are already at this stage, please arrive at point #10 of the "How can we solve it?" section in the essay: ask for help. The [[Wikipedia:Teahouse]] is a good resource for that. [[User:IceWelder|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">IceWelder</span>]] [[[User talk:IceWelder|<span style="color: #424242;">✉</span>]]] 08:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
:: Deleting first and then discuss is like shooting first to ask questions later. This is not what the guidelines for academic contributions suggest. But never mind. You suggested a step for asking for help. Remember, I did ask you for help. If you feel you can't help me because you lack "the in-depth knowledge of this particular topic" then why did you feel sufficiently confident to just erase text and an image which demonstrably proved useful to "people with rather little knowledge" such as teachers? If, on the other hand, you feel that you do have sufficient knowledge, why don't you help me? 29 April 2021.
== Unblock Request ==
| |||