Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: url. URLs might have been internationalized/anonymized. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | All pages linked from cached copy of User:Abductive/sandbox | via #UCB_webform_linked 212/697 |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Rescued 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 |
||
Line 18:
There have been many attempts to develop a process model but so far none have been universally accepted. Part of the reason for this may be due to the fact that many of the process models were designed for a specific environment, such as law enforcement, and they therefore could not be readily applied in other environments such as incident response.<ref name="adams" /> This is a list of the main models since 2001 in chronological order:<ref name="adams" />
* The Abstract Digital Forensic Model (Reith, et al., 2002)
* The Integrated Digital Investigative Process (Carrier & Spafford, 2003) [https://web.archive.org/web/20181223073625/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/915b/524318e2f0689b586ba7ae89ea39e9b22ce3.pdf]
* An Extended Model of Cybercrime Investigations (Ciardhuain, 2004)
* The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model (Baryamureeba & Tushabe, 2004)[https://www.dfrws.org/sites/default/files/session-files/pres-the_enhanced_digital_investigation_process_model.pdf]
| |||