Revision as of 22:06, 20 January 2007 edit Durova (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 60,685 edits →WP:RFI ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:15, 20 January 2007 edit undo M.K (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 13,165 edits →WP:RFI: some more Next edit →
Line 98: ::Now that was uncalled for! The user respectfully asked for more time to properly respond and he gets a block. That's not a fair treatment or justice or whatever you want to call it. It feels like sitting on someone's face ("Oh, you want a chance to defend yourself? Good, here's your block!") And the fact that he's busy and won't be around anyways is not an excuse for a block. He might as well deserve to be blocked, but not like this... in a rush and without any dignity and [[due care]]. [[User:Renata3\|Renata]] 22:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC) :::I've reviewed the evidence and consider the block meritorious. Based on what the editor posted it appears unlikely to interfere with his actual editing. Respectfully, <font face="Verdana">[[User:Durova\|<span style="color:#009">Durova</span>]]</font><sup>''[[User talk:Durova\|Charge!]]''</sup> 22:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC) ::::: Oh, sorry another editor point this already here, nevertheless my statement is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation&curid=689728&diff=102081121&oldid=102080178 here]. BTW, Durova if you intervene in this case are you also review and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Kazimieras_Gar.C5.A1va__.28history.7CWatchlist_this_WP:BLP_article.7Cunwatch.29_.5Bwatchlist.3F.5D this material], because [[user:Piotrus]] stared to labeling "extremist" term all around and this issue also corresponds on Dr. Dan`s case in RFI. Could, you be so kind and advise on this issue too. Thanks, [[User:M.K\|M.K.]] 22:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Durova