Content deleted Content added
Tomchen1989 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 149:
In the discussion at [[#Alternative name - ECMAScript engine]], I told [[User:Pmffl]] it's usually a good practice to mention all alternative names in the article to avoid confusion of the users that land on the page through redirection. Pmffl finally agreed to keep "ECMAScript engine" but still [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JavaScript_engine&type=revision&diff=908600312&oldid=908377402 completely removed] all abbreviations mentioned in the article including "JS engine", "ES engine" and "(JS)". Now, exactly what I anticipated is happening: users are confused about [[ES engine]] that redirects/links here (see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 23#ES engine]]). I've just [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JavaScript_engine&type=revision&diff=912853019&oldid=911449655 added back] these abbreviations although not in bold text. Please do not delete alternative names and useful abbreviations, they make the article more informative and avoid confusion by redirected user, please think about user experience when editing Wikipedia articles.--[[User:Tomchen1989|Tomchen1989]] ([[User talk:Tomchen1989|talk]]) 08:41, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
:The JS and ES abbreviations are not actually used within this article, so they shouldn't be defined. I removed them now. -[[User:Pmffl|Pmffl]] ([[User talk:Pmffl|talk]]) 15:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
| |||