Content deleted Content added
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 25 templates: del empty params (1×); hyphenate params (4×); |
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. |
||
Line 9:
===Familiarity===
A stimulus will have a higher [[Recollection|recall]] value if it is highly compatible with preexisting semantic structures (Craik, 1972). According to [[semantic network]] theories, this is because such a stimulus will have many connections to other encoded memories, which are activated based on closeness in semantic network structure.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.3758/BF03210735 |journal=Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |last=Rhodes |first=MG |author2=Anastasi JS |title=The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall |year=2000 |url=http://lamar.colostate.edu/~mrhodes/RA00.pdf |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=158–62 |pmid=10780030 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080906162014/http://lamar.colostate.edu/~mrhodes/RA00.pdf |archive-date=2008-09-06 |doi-access=free }}</ref> This activation increases cognitive analysis, increasing the strength of the memory representation. The familiarity modifier has been tested in [[implicit memory]] experiments, where subjects report false memories when presented with related stimuli.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Toth |first=JP |year=1996 |title=Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity |journal=Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3690/is_199603/ai_n8735087 |volume=50 |issue=1 |pmid=8653094 |pages=123–38 |doi=10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.123 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080124111249/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3690/is_199603/ai_n8735087 |archive-date=2008-01-24 }}</ref>
===Specificity of processing===
| |||