Latin hypercube sampling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m change to lowercase naming to be consistent and simpler to read
fix other; but peeking at literature it seems that "Latin" should remain capitalised
Line 24:
[[Image:LHSsampling.png|100px|right]]
 
In two dimensions the difference between random sampling, Latin Hypercubehypercube sampling, and orthogonal sampling can be explained as follows:
#In '''random sampling''' new sample points are generated without taking into account the previously generated sample points. One does not necessarily need to know beforehand how many sample points are needed.
#In '''latinLatin hypercube sampling''' one must first decide how many sample points to use and for each sample point remember in which row and column the sample point was taken. Such configuration is similar to having N [[Rook_(chess)|rooks]] on a chess board without threatening each other.
#In '''orthogonal sampling''', the sample space is divided into equally probable subspaces. All sample points are then chosen simultaneously making sure that the total set of sample points is a Latin Hypercube sample and that each subspace is sampled with the same density.