Image development (visual arts): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:02, 25 January 2007

Revision as of 08:21, 25 January 2007

Line 5:

The term is also used to distinguish the process of '''preparing elements''' for use in media (e.g. [[photograph]]s, [[illustration]]s, [[chart]]s, [[collage]]s) from the process of '''composing elements''' (e.g. [[page layout]], [[web development]], [[film editing]], [[desktop publishing]]) to a single presentation piece (e.g. [[brochure]], [[web page]], [[movie]], [[Billboard (advertising)|billboard]], [[poster]]). Artists that know [[Composition (visual arts)|composition]] skills may also know image development skills. They may do the image development themselves or collaborate with other individually skilled imaged developers. Collaboration with image developers may be more useful with higher budget projects and projects that require rare or completely unique image development styles.

Because "[[image]]" is a [[homonym]], the term "image development" may be confused with the development process for the [[corporate image]] called [[brand]]ing or [[Positioning (marketing)|positioning]]. Ironically, both uses of the term may apply in the same profession, such as the [[advertising agency]] who uses ''graphic'' image development in the process of developing the ''corporate'' image of a client. The term is also in contrast to "[[image editing]]" which excludes the capturing of images, creation of images from scratch by [[sculpting]] or [[artistic rendering|rendering]], and creation of images by calculating [[fractal]] mathematical functions. The term "image development" may have emerged due to the lack of an alternative umbrella term with as broad of a scope.

==See Also==