Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: arxiv added to citation with #oabot. |
Alter: pages. Add: eprint, class, bibcode, pmid, issue, journal. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed access-date with no URL. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this tool. Report bugs. | #UCB_Gadget |
||
Line 4:
There are several methods currently used by astronomers to detect distant [[exoplanet]]s from [[Earth]].<ref name="NASA-2020">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=5 Ways to Find a Planet |url=https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/alien-worlds/ways-to-find-a-planet/ |date=2020 |work=[[NASA]] |accessdate=24 October 2020 }}</ref> As well, some of these same methods, theoretically at least, may be used to detect the Earth as an exoplanet from distant star systems.
In June 2021, astronomers identified 1,715 stars (with likely related [[Planetary system|exoplanetary systems]]) within 326 [[light-year]]s (100 [[parsec]]s) that have a favorable positional vantage point—in relation to the Earth Transit Zone (ETZ)—of detecting [[Earth]] as an [[exoplanet]] [[Transit (astronomy)|transiting]] the [[Sun]] since the beginnings of human civilization (about 5,000 years ago); an additional 319 stars are expected to arrive at this special vantage point in the next 5,000 years.<ref name="NAT-20210623">{{cite journal |last1=Kaltenegger |first1=L. | author-link = Lisa Kaltenegger | last2=Faherty |first2=J.K.|title=Past, present and future stars that can see Earth as a transiting exoplanet |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03596-y |date=23 June 2021 |
According to researchers, the transit method is the most popular tool used to detect exoplanets and the most common tool to [[Astronomical spectroscopy|spectroscopically]] analyze [[Extraterrestrial_atmosphere#Exoplanets|exoplanetary atmospheres]].<ref name="RAS-20201020" /> As a result, such studies, based on the transit method, will be useful in the [[Extraterrestrial life|search for life on exoplanets]] beyond our [[Solar System]] by the [[Search for extraterrestrial intelligence|SETI program]], [[Breakthrough Listen|Breakthrough Listen Initiative]], as well as, upcoming exoplanetary [[Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite|TESS mission]] searches.<ref name="RAS-20201020" />
Detectability of Earth from distant star-based systems may allow for the [[Human|detectability of humanity]] and/or analysis of Earth from distant vantage points such as via "[[Technosignature#Atmospheric analysis|atmospheric SETI]]" for the detection of atmospheric compositions explainable only by use of (artificial) technology like [[Nitrogen dioxide#Human-caused sources and exposure|nitrogen dioxide]] [[air pollution]] from e.g. transportation technologies.<ref>{{cite news |title=Pollution on other planets could help us find aliens, Nasa says |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/alien-pollution-planets-nasa-b1801543.html |access-date=6 March 2021 |work=The Independent |date=12 February 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Can Alien Smog Lead Us to Extraterrestrial Civilizations? |url=https://www.wired.com/story/can-alien-smog-lead-us-to-extraterrestrial-civilizations/ |access-date=6 March 2021 |work=Wired |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kopparapu |first1=Ravi |last2=Arney |first2=Giada |last3=Haqq-Misra |first3=Jacob |last4=Lustig-Yaeger |first4=Jacob |last5=Villanueva |first5=Geronimo |title=Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution as a Signature of Extraterrestrial Technology |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |date=22 February 2021 |volume=908 |issue=2 |pages=164 |doi=10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |access-date=6 March 2021 |language=en |issn=1538-4357|arxiv=2102.05027|bibcode=2021ApJ...908..164K |s2cid=231855390 }}</ref> The easiest or most likely artificial signals to be detected from Earth are brief pulses transmitted by [[anti-ballistic missile]] (ABM) early-warning and space-surveillance radars during the [[Cold War]] and later astronomical and military radars.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The benefits and harm of transmitting into space |journal=Space Policy |date=1 February 2013 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=40–48 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265964612001361 |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en |issn=0265-9646|arxiv=1207.5540 |last1=Haqq-Misra |first1=Jacob |last2=Busch |first2=Michael W. |last3=Som |first3=Sanjoy M. |last4=Baum |first4=Seth D. |bibcode=2013SpPol..29...40H |s2cid=7070311 }}</ref><ref name="10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20">{{cite journal |last1=Sullivan |first1=W. T., III |title=Radio leakage and eavesdropping |journal=Strategies for the Search for Life in the Universe |series=Astrophysics and Space Science Library |date=1980 |volume=83 |pages=227–239 |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20 |bibcode=1980ASSL...83..227S |isbn=978-90-277-1226-4 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ASSL...83..227S/abstract |access-date=9 April 2021}}</ref> Unlike the earliest and conventional radio- and television-broadcasting which has been claimed to be undetectable at short distances,<ref>{{cite web |title=How far from Earth could aliens detect our radio signals? |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/how-far-from-earth-could-aliens-detect-our-radio-signals/ |website=BBC Science Focus Magazine |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=This is how far human radio broadcasts have reached into the galaxy |url=https://www.planetary.org/articles/3390 |website=The Planetary Society |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> such signals could be detected from very distant, possibly star-based, receiver stations – any single of which would detect brief episodes of powerful pulses repeating with intervals of one Earth day – and could be used to detect both Earth as well as the presence of – a radar-utilizing – civilization on it.<ref>{{cite journal |title=XI. - Planets and Life around Other Stars |journal=International Geophysics |date=1 January 2004 |volume=87 |pages=592–608 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0074614204800251 |access-date=5 April 2021 |publisher=Academic Press |doi=10.1016/S0074-6142(04)80025-1 |isbn=9780124467446 |language=en}}</ref><!--https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/radar-transmission--> However, studies have suggested that radio broadcast leakage – with the program material likely not being detectable – may be a technosignature detectable at distances of up to a hundred light years with technology equivalent to the [[Square Kilometer Array]]<ref>{{cite web |title=How Far Into Space Can Radio Telescopes Hear? |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/01/27/how-far-into-space-can-radio-telescopes-hear/ |website=Forbes |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> if the ___location of Earth is known.<ref>{{cite journal |title=A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis |journal=Space Policy |date=1 November 2016 |volume=38 |pages=22–26 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.06.001
{{-}}
==See also==
|