Half-exponential function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
example
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.
Line 12:
 
Another definition is that ''ƒ'' is half-exponential if it is [[Monotonic function|non-decreasing]] and ''ƒ''<sup>−1</sup>(''x''<sup>''C''</sup>)&nbsp;≤&nbsp;o(log&thinsp;''x'').
for every&nbsp;''C''&thinsp;>&thinsp;0.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Alexander A. Razborov |author2=Steven Rudich |title=Natural Proofs |journal=Journal of Computer and System Sciences |volume=55 |issue=1 |date=August 1997 |pages=24–35 |doi=10.1006/jcss.1997.1494|doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
It has been proven that if a function ''ƒ'' is defined using the standard arithmetic operations, exponentials, [[logarithm]]s, and [[Real number|real]]-valued constants, then ''ƒ''(''ƒ''(''x'')) is either subexponential or superexponential.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://mathoverflow.net/q/45477 | title=Fractional iteration - "Closed-form" functions with half-exponential growth}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=263#comment-7283 |title=Shtetl-Optimized » Blog Archive » My Favorite Growth Rates |publisher=Scottaaronson.com |date=2007-08-12 |accessdate=2014-05-20}}</ref> Thus, a [[Hardy field#Examples|Hardy ''L''-function]] cannot be half-exponential.
Line 26:
| title = Functional powers near a fixed point
| volume = 132
| year = 1988| doi-access = free
}}</ref> The function <math>f</math> is the unique solution to the [[functional equation]]
 
:<math> f (x) =