Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsilon function: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13:
*'''Delete''' Search finds some upsilon functions, but none that are clearly the same as this one. Looks like Wikipedia may have the honour of being the original source for this particular gem! --[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 05:39, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. I've also not been able to find anything published supporting the claims in the article. — [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 06:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Likely self-promotion, and not wiki-notable. The term "upsilon function" appears occasionally in the literature, but it refers to other things (in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.1795 knot theory], for example). [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 16:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
|