Content deleted Content added
m →Persistence as fringe theories: Probably written with strong Conflict of Interest (COI). The article of Yagil and Sussman of 1986 is completely misinterpreted. They never claim to say that the B-DNA conformation is not the most common in nature, precisely the article starts talking about the B-DNA conformation, and how it could possibly assume other intermediate conformations, some of them they model. The A to BDNA conformational transitions are very well known and documented in literature |
Have remove the {{{expert needed}} tag, since I think it's probably no longer necessary, but happy for ppl to re-add if thought appropriate |
||
Line 1:
In addition to the variety of verified [[Nucleic acid structure|DNA structures]], there have been a range of proposed DNA models that have either been disproven, or lack evidence.
| |||