Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer coding: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HumanxAnthro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
HumanxAnthro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 38:
**https://www.cjr.org/special_report/queer-media-bachelor-magazine.php
:Note that this is the result of less than 10 minutes of google searching, and there are some scholarly results in there, as well. [[User:MjolnirPants|<span style="color:#004400;">'''ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants'''</span>]] <small><small>[[User_talk:MjolnirPants|''Tell me all about it.'']]</small></small> 22:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Poor unfortunate nomination. So [[WP:DISRUPTIVE]], so [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]]'''. This is just a user having a hissy fit towards the fact that his childhood, "traditions and values" is being somehow pissed on. We don't determine deletion based on a person's feelings; we determine it based on the coverage of the topic. Look at how freaking easy it was to find reliable sources about this topic. You'd have to try hard not to find any of them. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=%22Queer+coding%22&btnG= Two results of the first page of a Google Scholar search are pieces '''MAINLY''' about queer coding]. Hell, you don't even need to go to Google Scholar. [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Queer+coding%22&sxsrf=ALeKk00gtT4znB9f7RBNclHsMyWOFXmSKg%3A1626563463265&ei=h2PzYI-9D5Kl5NoPkOCSuAM&oq=%22Queer+coding%22&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgQIABBDMgIIADICCAA6BQgAELADOgkIABCwAxAHEB5KBAhBGAFQrAJYrAJggwRoAHAAeACAAVKIAfEBkgEBM5gBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXrIAQrAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwjPnLqLnevxAhWSElkFHRCwBDcQ4dUDCA4&uact=5 It only took me reading the first page of a Google search where I just typed in the phrase] where I got four features '''mainly''' about queer coding. [https://www.pride.com/movies/2021/5/05/lets-talk-about-queer-coding-its-history-film-and-tv] [https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/the-strange-difficult-history-of-queer-coding] [https://collider.com/queer-coded-villains-in-film-erasure/] [https://www.dccomics.com/blog/2021/06/25/the-rise-and-fall-of-comic-book-queer-coding] three of which aren't even LGBTQ-themed publications. '''Just close this bullshit'''. [[User:HumanxAnthro|👨x🐱]] ([[User talk:HumanxAnthro|talk]]) 23:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
**'''Additional comment'''. The nominator, in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna as a gay icon|!voting Delete on the article Madonna as a gay icon]], used the same nonsensical [[moral outrage]] that had nothing to do with the topic's notability or coverage. This is indicative that they are [[WP:NOTHERE]] to build an encyclopedia. I mean, look at this crazy stuff:
:::{{tq|I have never seen such blasphemy in my life. Painting a person like Judy Garland as a homosexual is blasphemy and a defamation against the woman who was married to a man! This is utter cursing, and I know how I feel when someone says I am LGBT. These articles foment division and hatred towards the heterosexual people and is a sign that these criminals are desperate to see at least 10% of the world population converted to LGBT before their mortal lifespan is finished. If this continues the fiefdom of LGBT will dominate and completely make Wikipedia's suffix meaningless.<br>Just take a look what they have done to American animation. Armed with their liberal news media they have completely hijacked films such as Luca and Mitchells vs. Machines. No longer does it mean to say that if you have a girlfriend or a boyfriend, it means that you are gay because you are the same gender! What utter nonsense. Thousands of prominent authors stated they have boyfriends and girlfriends. Can we rule them as homosexuals? No, only if ultra liberal news media like NBC come to their defense and spin tales of how the rainbow is LGBT...if you see a rainbow outside...or wait if you wear a rainbow pin...Oh that must be LGBT! This is the frenzy of avarice they have against the human kind who continue to live the life nature intended.}}
| |||