Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer coding: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 44:
*'''Keep''' nomination seems to be based heavily on the nominator’s ignorant LGBTQ-phobic opinions barely hidden behind flimsy claims of “NPOV”/“inadequate sourcing”. [[User:Dronebogus|Dronebogus]] ([[User talk:Dronebogus|talk]]) 23:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The notion that queerness did not exist "in those days" is misguided and ill-informed at best. The appeal to "traditions and values" suggests we are not dealing with a best case scenario. [[User:Richard Nevell|Richard Nevell]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell|talk]]) 00:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Where are my supporters? I thought I had some traditional supporters by my side? This is unbelievable. I am like the only person in Wikipedia who tries to delete [[NPOV]] articles related to LGBT. The citations used were - 1)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxokB7sfopc 2)https://andreasdeja.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-evolution-of-jafar.html 3)https://ohmy.disney.com/movies/2015/10/13/8-things-you-didnt-know-about-aladdin/ 4)https://controlforever.com/read/queercoding-and-horror-films/ . Do you not see those citations are not valid in Wikipedia?
:Note user [[User:MjolnirPants]] noted this citation: https://www.insider.com/luca-lgbt-gay-queer-coded-2021-6 is good to be used in queer coding. If you look at [[Luca (2021 film)]], the director explicitly denied the main character is LGBT, then how can that citation that says Luca is LGBT and queer coded be valid? All these citations are following [[WP:SYNTH]] which is using a variety of sources to imply a suggestion that characters are queer-coded when they are not! Whatever you do do not ruin Classical Golden Age Disney. There is zero evidence that the characters Jafar and Scar are LGBT and to the extent therefore they are queer-coded. [[User:7falcon23|7falcon23]] ([[User talk:7falcon23|talk]]) 00:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
| |||