Content deleted Content added
Crossroads (talk | contribs) →Better sources: re |
Crossroads (talk | contribs) →Proposed merge of Sissy villain into Queer coding: new section |
||
Line 34:
Reposted from the AFD for future reference. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 04:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
:Some of those aren't that great (Buzzfeed, for example). We should be using scholarly sources from the field of LGBT studies, not articles that may barely be more than blog posts spouting some writer's opinion. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 03:44, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
== Proposed merge of [[Sissy villain]] into [[Queer coding]] ==
Both of these articles are very short, and a "sissy villain" is the same exact topic as queer coding. We don't do [[WP:CFORK]]s. "Sissy villain" is somehow an even more inflammatory title than "queer coding". The former has an oddly high number of non-English sources, so I wonder if translation from another language Wikipedia may be part of the issue. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 04:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
| |||