Content deleted Content added
→Historical application: Isn't this part talking about Portugal? Spain shows up randomly. Not sure if it is supposed to be Spain or Portugal, but the way the sentances were arranged before did not make sense. |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Amigao | Category:International relations theory | #UCB_Category 159/165 |
||
Line 18:
In general, hegemonic periods last approximately 60 to 90 years and conflicts which result in a period stabilization of power distribution last approximately 20 years.<ref name="Wittkopf"/> This can be explained through [[war-weariness]] and the tendency (although this was broken in the first half of the 20th century) for nations not to engage themselves in another conflict after being involved in a power transition.<ref name="Wittkopf"/>
Power transitions play an important role in applications of the [[bargaining model of war]] where wars are more likely to break out and be severe in situations of uncertainty and commitment problems. During power transitions, it is harder for actors to credibly commit to abide by any agreement, thus creating major commitment problems.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Powell|first=Robert|date=2006|title=War as a Commitment Problem|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020818306060061|journal=International Organization|volume=60|issue=1|pages=|doi=10.1017/s0020818306060061|s2cid=15861342|issn=0020-8183|via=}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite book|last=Weisiger|first=Alex|date=2013|title=Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Conflicts|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt1xx5pk|language=en|publisher=Cornell University Press|volume=|pages=|jstor=10.7591/j.ctt1xx5pk|isbn=9780801451867|via=}}</ref>
==See also==
| |||