Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Skomorokh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
|||
Line 108:
#'''Support'''. Didn't think I'd see the day! Outstanding, detailed, and careful content editor, unreservedly one of our better ones. I've fulfilled many-a-request for admin help for Skomorokh (userfying deleted pages for him to work and improve and resubmit, for example) over the months. I've even told him to run for adminship on at least one occasion. I'm glad you finally see the benefits that Wikipedia will have by having you have the full button-set. (that was a lot of haves, but I think the grammar holds). Absolutely you should have the admin bit so you can, when you want to, do the small things that you now have to ask other admins for with your cap in hand when you have proven you are perfectly capable of making sound and meticulous judgments. It's a yes from me! [[User:Keeper76|<font color="#21421E" face="comic sans ms">Keeper</font>]] | [[User talk:Keeper76|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">76</font>]] 14:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
# 1) Been around a while, 2) Hasn't done anything that stood out as crazy or stupid, 3) Seems clueful. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 14:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User talk:Giants27|<
#'''Support''' Absolutely. Every so often we see a candidate and wonder why it has taken so long for a nomination to emerge. This is one of those. Should have had the tools months ago. Years, possibly.--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony.bradbury|'''Anthony.bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 14:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The very model of a modern Wikipedian. - Dank ([[User talk:Dank|push to talk]]) 14:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
|