Content deleted Content added
Replacing Tulip_-_floriade_canberra.jpg with File:Tulipa_suaveolens_floriade_to_Canberra.jpg (by CommonsDelinker because: File renamed: Criterion 3 (obvious error) · Nome della specie). |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 574:
<blockquote>This article has been '''automatically assessed''' and rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]<br />If you disagree with the assessment, please re-rate and remove the auto=yes parameter. Please also remove the auto=yes parameter if you agree.</blockquote>
Thoughts? –[[user:xeno|<
:I agree, I've always found it too big. I would also keep the message as short as possible. Something like "Automatically assessed as [link|Stub-Class] on the [link|quality scale]. Please remove the |auto=yes parameter from the banner, and [link|re-assess] if needed." [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {<sup>[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub> – [[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 14:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 582:
::Yep, that's even better. Hows this:
::<blockquote>"This article has been <nowiki>[[</nowiki>[[WP:Automatic assessment]]|automatically assessed]] as [link|XX-Class] on the [link|quality scale]. Please remove the |auto=yes parameter from the banner, and [link|re-assess] if needed."</blockquote>
::(I've just penned [[WP:Automatic assessment]], feel free to tweak as desired.) While we're here, we should add the ability for it to function for FA and FL as well, which can be auto-assessed by checking for the {{tl|featured article}}/list template. –[[user:xeno|<
:::If it helps at all, '''[[Talk:Bad Man of Deadwood|this]]''' is an example of what I coded for {{para|auto|yes}} in the [[WP:FILM|WikiProject Films]] banner. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 15:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
::::An elegant placement. Much less intrusive. I dare not touch this beast, could you implement this Happy-melon? –[[user:xeno|<
:::::I'll have a look at implementing this in the next day or two. I love that robot icon! — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I've put some code in [[Template:WPBannerMeta/core/sandbox]]. Here's an example: — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 17:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Norway/sandbox|class=stub|auto=yes|category=no}}
:::If the feature requests I've asked for at [[WT:Plugin++]] are implemented, my bot may begin auto-assessing as other ratings. Can we have it be more general? –[[user:xeno|<
::::This will require slightly more caution because it may affect existing uses. At the moment, auto=yes has no effect unless class=stub. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 17:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I suggest that as a first step we could implement this just for Stub-Class (i.e. to match existing functionality) and then continue the discussion about adding support for other auto assessments. Perhaps someone could double-check the sandbox code? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 08:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
:I'm fine with that. Someone else should double check the code, I'm not too familiar with the inner workings of this beast of a template. –[[user:xeno|<
::Perhaps WOSlinker is around? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 18:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
:::Hi, I've had a look through the changes in the core sandbox and it all looks fine for auto Stubs. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 11:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Line 602:
::::*[[WP:AUTOASSESS]] is not linked to yet; maybe "automatically rated" should point there?
::::— Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
:::::That sounds like a plan, link to [[WP:AUTOASSESS]]. –[[user:xeno|<
::::::You could also unlink rated as it's already linked to on the Stub assessment line above the auto assessment note. So not really a need to link twice, especially if you are going to add a link to [[WP:AUTOASSESS]]. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 12:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
:::::::{{done}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 13:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I'd suggest linking "bot" to [[WP:BOT]] as well. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 13:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
::::::::We don't have "bot" yet. Which is more grammatical - "automatically rated by a bot as Stub-Class" or "automatically rated as Stub-Class by a bot"? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 13:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
:::::::::Prefer the latter. –[[user:xeno|<
::::::::::{{added}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 22:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
|