Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PonyDuck21 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Open requests: assess MacPorts. rm completed. |
||
Line 36:
# {{article|<Sample Article>}} — requested by {{user|<Sample User>}} ~~~~~ -->
# {{article|Tapas (website)}} — requested by {{user|HenryCrun15}} 03:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
# {{article|Vector processor}} requested by {{User|lkcl}} have spent some considerable time updating it, correcting some serious *industry-wide* misassertions (yes, really, not "mistakes by other wikipedia editors", actual misleading misassertions by major processor manufacturers). i'm also recommending that the page be upgraded to "Top" or, at a push, "high", because Vector processing is over 60 years old and is the core fundamental basis of all GPUs on the planet and the majority of supercomputers as well. in talk page. [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 17:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
#: holy cow! 477 pages link to this one! [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 18:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
#: also having read the critera i would advocate it seems to meet the criteria for a "B" class. i don't think it meets "GA" or "A" criteria. [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 18:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
#::I have some concerns with the direction this article has taken. I have started a discussion at [[Talk:Vector_processor#Discernable_features]]. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
# <s>{{article|
===== Transcluded requests =====
|