Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)
Line 710:
:::::::::I've commented there. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 17:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 
*There was never consensus to continue with PC after the trial. There is now a two-thirds consensus to remove it from articles for now, and this is the usual standard for consensus; comparing it to the higher standard needed for RfA isn't appropriate. [[User:SlimVirgin|<fontspan colorstyle="color:black;">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</fontspan>]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|<fontspan colorstyle="color:gold;">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|TALK<nowiki>|]]</fontnowiki><font color="lime"/span>]][[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|<span style="color:lime;">CONTRIBS]]</fontspan>]]</sup></small> 22:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
** I have to agree with this, my concern was that the consensus in this case was invalid due to too much [[WP:DEADHORSE]] beating regardless of the percentages involved. Not that the percentage isn't high enough for a consensus. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 22:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
::We already have the only consensus we need to stop the trial now: it's in last year's "two-month extension" debate. Stopping is automatic unless there is a further consensus to extend. Do the ''oppose'' statements above outweigh ''support'' enough to form a consensus to extend? I think not. [[User:Certes|Certes]] ([[User talk:Certes|talk]]) 12:31, 12 April 2011 (UTC)