Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
|||
Line 16:
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Tim Song|Tim Song]] ([[User talk:Tim Song|talk]]) 00:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:NuclearWarfare|<
This has been listed for more than two weeks, nobody has made any claim in its defense and it was relisted? Why? Get rid of this spam junk. What does it take to realize PR companies are on to the game of how to get on Wikipedia? Make an account, make a couple useless edits. Write the article you want. Fake the references. Never use that account again. Wikipedia can't compete against the promotional budget of a corporation by playing nice. Get rid of crap promotional articles about products. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]]) 06:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 22:
* '''Keep''': I see significant coverage in independent reliable sources in three external links. That's an easy keep to me. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 00:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:NuclearWarfare|<
<small>'''Note:''' This AfD was temporarily closed by [[User:Cirt|Cirt]] but Cirt then relisted following [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 November 18|this deletion review]]. Please note the claimed sources in that discussion.—[[User:S Marshall|<font face="Verdana" color="Maroon">'''S Marshall'''</font>]] [[User talk:S Marshall|<font color="Maroon" size="0.5"><sup>Talk</sup></font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|<font color="Maroon" size="0.5"><sub>Cont</sub></font>]] 21:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Sources are mostly [[WP:SPAM]], fail [[WP:RS]], consisting of blogs and press releases and other spammy things pushed out by the company, and the page seems mostly to be [[Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement]]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||