Dupleix-class cruiser: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:45, 31 July 2021

Revision as of 04:44, 23 August 2021

Line 9:

|Name=''Dupleix'' class

|Builders=

|Operators={{navy|FRAFrance}}

|Class before={{sclass-|Gueydon|cruiser|4}}

|Class after={{sclass-|Gloire|cruiser|4}}

|Cost=

|Built range= 1897–1904

Line 64:

A traditionalist Navy Minister, [[Vice Admiral]] ({{lang|fr|Vice amiral}}) [[Armand Besnard]], succeeded the liberal politician [[Édouard Lockroy]] in April 1896, after the latter had authorized construction of the very large armored cruiser {{ship|French cruiser|Jeanne d'Arc|1899|2}} in the 1896 budget proposal, despite opposition from the {{lang|fr|Conseil des travaux}}. After rejecting a repeat {{convert|8000|t|LT|lk=on|adj=on|sp=us|0}} [[protected cruiser]] like {{ship|French cruiser|D'Entrecasteaux||2}} in the 1896 budget, Lockroy and his allies in the Budget Committee were willing to accept smaller cruisers in the following year's budget. The {{lang|fr|Conseil des travaux}} rejected Besnard's proposal for a {{convert|5700|t|LT|adj=on|sp=us|0}} protected cruiser in late 1896,<ref name=r6/> saying that the navy "needed ships that can deal out and withstand punishment",<ref>Jordan & Caresse, p. 77</ref> but Besnard authorized construction of {{ship|French cruiser|Jurien de la Gravière||2}} a few weeks later in the 1897 budget proposal anyway.<ref name=r6>Ropp, p. 286</ref>

In the meantime, the Superior Naval Council had produced a new naval program that included an additional three each armored and protected cruisers for overseas service and five armored cruisers for service with the battle fleet. For the 1898 budget, Besnard proposed one battleship, two armored cruisers and two protected cruisers, but Lockroy and his allies, probably influenced by the ideas of Vice Admiral [[François Ernest Fournier]], who believed that most cruiser tasks, including commerce raiding, would be better performed by armored cruisers smaller than ''Jeanne d'Arc'', deleted the battleship and offered him 120 million [[French franc|francs]] for armored cruisers. Besnard initially proposed adding an enlarged version of ''Jeanne d'Arc'', but this was rejected by the {{lang|fr|Conseil des travaux}} in early 1897. He countered with a revised program of three armored cruisers for overseas duties, which became the ''Dupleix'' class, and three {{sclass-|Gueydon|cruiser|0}} armored cruisers for the fleet. This satisfied the Superior Naval Council's objectives and all three factions as Fourier's ideas showed that armored cruisers could accomplish the {{lang|fr|Jeune École}}'s preferred strategy of commerce raiding. It also neatly consumed the Budget Committee's 120 million francs as each of the ''Dupleix''s cost about 19 million francs and the ''Gueydon''s 21 million francs.<ref>Jordan & Caresse, pp. 77–78; Ropp, pp. 286, 288</ref>

Preliminary design work in December 1896 was for a {{convert|7300|t|LT|sp=us|adj=on|0}} ship armed with ten {{convert|164.7|mm|adj=on|sp=us|1}} guns, two in single-[[gun turret]]s fore and aft of the superstructure and the remaining eight in [[Casemate#Single casemates (1889 onwards)|casemates]], protected by a {{convert|70|mm|adj=on|sp=us}} [[waterline]] [[armor belt]]. The {{lang|fr|Conseil de travaux}} thought that the belt protection was too weak and that the ships needed more endurance. The [[naval architect]] [[Louis-Émile Bertin]], recently appointed as the Director of Naval Construction ({{lang|fr|Directeur centrale des constructions navales}}), agreed and revised the design, sacrificing one pair of guns for more armor and additional coal, which increased its displacement. The {{lang|fr|Conseil}} accepted his revised design on 4 May 1897, although complaining about the deleted guns.<ref>Jordan & Caresse, pp. 79–80</ref>

Line 155:

{{Dupleix class cruiser}}

{{WWI French ships}}

{{WWIFrenchShips}}

{{coord|48|17|13|N|4|50|50|W|region:TK_type:landmark_source:kolossus-dewiki|display=title}}