Content deleted Content added
Josh Grosse (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sam Francis (talk | contribs) mythology and symbolism |
||
Line 50:
I think I don't understand why we have the taxoboxes, then. Recall on [[Talk:Chordate]] you said that their top half was usually irrelevant, so obviously what value the taxoboxes have derives largely from their bottom half. But here, we find that the bottom half is necessarily redundant, because the same information needs to be copied out in the article proper. If both halves are unnecessary, what purpose does the whole serve? Possibly they're convenient navigational tools - I definitely appreciated them when working on the [[ciliate]]s - but that was ''without'' lists in the articles themselves. I'm not sure I can say those wouldn't work just as well. -- [[user:Josh Grosse|Josh]]
-----
Something on [[birds in mythology]] and symbolism would be good! Is there anything already on the wikipedia in that area? --[[User:Sam Francis|Sam]] 10:39 8 Jun 2003 (UTC)
|