Content deleted Content added
→(Missing header): remove incorrect claim. The comment was not from me but from "Bailey.d.r". (See history of this talk page). All I did was add a missing heading. |
Correcting editor and reverting part of revision 1040736206 by Feline Hymnic (talk) |
||
Line 167:
== (Missing header) ==
I have no idea to how to edit, but I'm not sure where this idea of the relevancy of prescription of treating "proper" nouns as prescriptive comes from. It's difficult to take anyone who resists popular nomenclature seriously as a descriptivist, and it's not clear what the value of an article could be without claiming such a standard of narrative. I would expect, at minimum, an argument of value to persuade others to break from descriptive nomenclature. I'm not sure how editing works around here, but editing clearly failed here. It's not clear what goal the editor who named this ideology is trying to advance by altering the name. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bailey.d.r|Bailey.d.r]] ([[User talk:Bailey.d.r#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bailey.d.r|contribs]]) 21:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)</span>
| |||