Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Provably fair algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
|||
Line 11:
**At the moment it's a [[WP:TNT]]. I note also that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Provably_fair_algorithm&oldid=655297560 as started by you, it was cited to a single bitcoin site] - rather than being a high-quality article wrecked by bad editors as you posit, there's no evidence that this article was ever of acceptable quality in the past six years. This strongly suggests there is no reasonable prospect of organic improvement. If you could rebuild the hypothetical good article you posit using the claimed good and non-crypto-blog/non-press-release sources, that would be a start - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 10:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>
[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 11:13, 31 August 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Provably fair algorithm]]</noinclude></div> * '''Delete'''. After looking at the history I can only agree with what [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] said. [[User:Athel cb|Athel cb]] ([[User talk:Athel cb|talk]]) 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
| |||