Kakutani fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Adding local short description: "On when a function f: S→Pow(S) on a compact nonempty convex subset S⊂ℝⁿ has a fixed point", overriding Wikidata description "theorem that a function f: S→Pow(S) on a compact nonempty convex subset S⊂ℝⁿ, whose graph is closed and whose image f(x) is nonempty and convex for all x∈S, has a fixed point" (Shortdesc helper)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: title, url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: isbn, jstor, doi-access, bibcode, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 625/936
Line 7:
| first = Shizuo
| author-link = Shizuo Kakutani
| title = A generalization of Brouwer’sBrouwer's fixed point theorem
| journal = Duke Mathematical Journal
| volume = 8
Line 23:
 
==Statement==
Kakutani's theorem states:<ref name=Osborne>{{cite book |lastlast1=Osborne |firstfirst1=Martin J. |author2-link=Ariel Rubinstein |first2=Ariel |last2=Rubinstein |title=A Course in Game Theory |___location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=MIT |year=1994 }}</ref>
: ''Let'' ''S'' ''be a [[empty set|non-empty]], [[compact set|compact]] and [[convex set|convex]] [[subset]] of some [[Euclidean space]]'' '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>.
:''Let'' ''φ'':&nbsp;''S''&nbsp;→&nbsp;2<sup>''S''</sup> ''be a [[set-valued function]] on'' ''S'' ''with the following properties:''
Line 115:
| pmid = 16588946
| issue = 1
| pmc = 1063129 | bibcode = 1950PNAS...36...48N
| pmc = 1063129 }}</ref> Stated informally, the theorem implies the existence of a [[Nash equilibrium]] in every finite game with mixed strategies for any number of players. This work later earned him a [[Nobel Prize in Economics]]. In this case:
| doi-access = free
| pmc = 1063129 }}</ref> Stated informally, the theorem implies the existence of a [[Nash equilibrium]] in every finite game with mixed strategies for any number of players. This work later earned him a [[Nobel Prize in Economics]]. In this case:
 
* The base set ''S'' is the set of [[tuple]]s of [[mixed strategy|mixed strategies]] chosen by each player in a game. If each player has ''k'' possible actions, then each player's strategy is a ''k''-tuple of probabilities summing up to 1, so each player's strategy space is the [[standard simplex]] in '''''R'''''<sup>''k''</sup>''.'' Then, ''S'' is the cartesian product of all these simplices. It is indeed a nonempty, compact and convex subset of '''''R'''''<sup>''kn''</sup>''.''
Line 131 ⟶ 133:
| year = 1997
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Lv3VtS9CcAoC&pg
| isbn = 978-0-521-56473-1
}}</ref> The existence of such prices had been an open question in economics going back to at least [[Léon Walras|Walras]]. The first proof of this result was constructed by [[Lionel McKenzie]].<ref>{{cite journal |first=Lionel |last=McKenzie |title=On Equilibrium in Graham's Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems |journal=[[Econometrica]] |volume=22 |issue=2 |year=1954 |pages=147–161 |doi=10.2307/1907539 |jstor=1907539 }}</ref>
 
In this case:
Line 239 ⟶ 241:
| doi = 10.1073/pnas.38.2.121
| pmid = 16589065
| pmc = 1063516}}</ref>| bibcode = 1952PNAS...38..121F
| doi-access = free
}}</ref>
To state the theorem in this case, we need a few more definitions:
;Upper hemicontinuity: A set-valued function φ:&nbsp;''X''→2<sup>''Y''</sup> is '''[[upper hemicontinuous]]''' if for every [[open set]] ''W''&nbsp;⊂&nbsp;''Y'', the set {''x''|&nbsp;φ(''x'')&nbsp;⊂&nbsp;''W''} is open in ''X''.<ref name="dugundji">
Line 251 ⟶ 255:
| publisher = Springer
| chapter = Chapter II, Section 5.8
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=4_iJAoLSq3cC
| format = limited preview
| isbn = 978-0-387-00173-9
Line 277 ⟶ 281:
 
==Anecdote==
In his game theory textbook,<ref>{{cite book |last=Binmore |first=Ken |title=Playing for Real: A Text on Game Theory |year=2007 |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=1st |chapter=When Do Nash Equilibria Exist? |page=256 |isbn=978-0-19-804114-6 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NycDSDcmSM4C&pg=PA256 }}</ref> [[Ken Binmore]] recalls that Kakutani once asked him at a conference why so many economists had attended his talk. When Binmore told him that it was probably because of the Kakutani fixed point theorem, Kakutani was puzzled and replied, "What is the Kakutani fixed point theorem?"
 
==References==
Line 310 ⟶ 314:
| year = 1971
| publisher = Holden-Day
| isbn = 9780816202751
}} <small>(Standard reference on [[general equilibrium]] theory. Chapter 5 uses Kakutani's theorem to prove the existence of equilibrium prices. Appendix C includes a proof of Kakutani's theorem and discusses its relationship with other mathematical results used in economics.)</small>
 
==External links==