Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:35, 5 March 2006

Revision as of 09:46, 16 September 2021

Line 22:

*'''Delete''' 4DL and HQ9+. 4DL doesn't seem notable and is just a stub, HQ9+ is full of external (probably vanity) links. No opinion about Beatnik, as that seems to be at least decently-written article (though its notability is dubious). --[[User:Donhalcon|bmills]] 03:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' HQ9+, or merge and redirect to [[Cliff L. Biffle]] - I'm surprised about the number of Google results; AFAIK it is a popular piece of programmer humor, but I could be wrong. '''Delete''' or merge the other two. [[User:Quamaretto|Quamaretto]] 20:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' or redirect these, but do not delete. Notable enough to warrant an article each. <font color="green">[[User:Lar/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">+]]</fontspan>]]+[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 05:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>