Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BU Rob13: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)
Line 318:
#'''Support''' per Athomeinkobe. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 05:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per Athomeinkobe. I really really wish I had gotten here sooner, because they seem to have captured my sentiments precisely. None of the oppose rationales I'm seeing are persuasive - and they are balanced against a good amount of clueful editing and considered opinions. No objections, good luck. [[User:Ultraexactzz|UltraExactZZ]] <sup> [[User_talk:Ultraexactzz|Said]] </sup>~<small> [[Special:Contributions/Ultraexactzz|Did]] </small> 15:44, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I do appreciate a few of the concerns of the oppose voters, but I don't see enough to warrant an oppose vote against the support reasons. I am also OK with his answer to my question about legal threats. [[User:Sir Joseph|Sir Joseph]] <sup><font color="Green">[[User_talk:Sir Joseph|<sup style="color:green;">(talk)]]</font></sup>]] 17:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I think the candidate can be trusted. The objections below have not convinced me that making the candidate an admin won't be a clear net positive. [[User:Pincrete|Pincrete]] ([[User talk:Pincrete|talk]]) 20:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We require excellence, not perfection. [[User:DavidLeighEllis|DavidLeighEllis]] ([[User talk:DavidLeighEllis|talk]]) 23:21, 8 July 2016 (UTC)