Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 3 discussion(s) from Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace) (bot
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m Task 24: removal of a template following a TFD
Line 84:
{{edit template-protected|Template:Uw-ublock-double|answered=y}}
Change <code><nowiki>{{unblock-un|user=your new username here|reason=your reason here}}</nowiki></code> with <code><nowiki>{{unblock-un|your new username here|your reason here}}
</nowiki></code> as having <code>user=</code> doesn't auto populate new username while renaming. &#8208;&#8208;‐‐[[User:1997kB|1997kB]]&nbsp;([[User_talk:1997kB|talk]]) 02:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
: {{Not done}} I've fixed the rename link instead. —&thinsp;[[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]]&thinsp;<small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 02:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 
Line 336:
 
==Discussion at [[WT:TM#Uw-nonfree wording (repost)]]==
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[WT:TM#Uw-nonfree wording (repost)]]. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 14:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] -->
 
== Template:Single notice links ==
 
So I just came across this monstrosity and I have to say, it's doing an awful job at serving its purpose as a navigational aide. Snarky remark aside, {{tl|single notice links}} is anything but navigable in its current state. Never mind that it's a horizontal list: there's also the {{tl|tl}} brackets, asymmetrical left-right split, wasted whitespace, and arbitrarily color-coded headers. It also doesn't collapse, which probably can't be all that much desired. Anyways, instead of complaining I think I'll do some tinkering when time permits. Curious to hear your opinions. [[User:Jay D. Easy|jdeazy]]&#8202;([[User talk:Jay D. Easy|t]]&#8202;•&#8202; • [[Special:Contributions/Jay D. Easy|c]]) 02:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
:[[User:Jay D. Easy|jdeazy]], you have my Support to tinker. I don't think I've ever seen that template before, but I concur with your comments. The spam of brackets are redundant. Making it collapsible sounds like a plus. The unbalanced left-right split would probably work better as a top/bottom split. I suggest the shorter list go on top. When people quit visually-scanning long content it can cause short content at the bottom to perceptually disappear. [[User:Alsee|Alsee]] ([[User talk:Alsee|talk]]) 16:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
::{{yo|Alsee}} how's this instead? [[User:Jay D. Easy|Jay D.&nbsp;Easy]]&#8202;([[User talk:Jay D. Easy|t]]&#8202;•&#8202;[[Special:Contributions/Jay D. Easy|c]]) 22:18, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Line 734:
 
{{edit template-protected|Template:Uw-test1|answered=yes}}
Regarding {{tl|uw-test1}}: the word {{tq|practice}} as used in the template is a noun; the correct verb should be "practise". &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family:'Trajan Pro','Perpetua Titling MT',Perpetua,serif">'''[[User:Ravenpuff|<span style="color:#22254a">RAVEN</span><span style="color:#996e00">PVFF</span>]]'''</span>&nbsp;<b>&middot;·</b> ''[[User talk:Ravenpuff|talk]]''&nbsp;<b>&middot;·</b> 14:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC) &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family:'Trajan Pro','Perpetua Titling MT',Perpetua,serif">'''[[User:Ravenpuff|<span style="color:#22254a">RAVEN</span><span style="color:#996e00">PVFF</span>]]'''</span>&nbsp;<b>&middot;·</b> ''[[User talk:Ravenpuff|talk]]''&nbsp;<b>&middot;·</b> 14:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
:[[WP:ENGVAR]]. In US English, "practice" is the only acceptable spelling of all parts of speech for this word. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 14:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)