Content deleted Content added
Historyday01 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 45:
::You created the Sissy Villain article, yes, but it is a subset of this phenomenon, and one of the biggest examples of it. It is just a different term. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 04:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - simply a fork of the article. Readers are best served by keeping the information in one place. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 16:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
*'''Support''' as the "Sissy villain" article was created in June 2021. I have to agree with One15969 and HumanxAnthro. Crossroads was right to propose this. And DaddyCell can still add sources by using Google Scholar to a "sissy villain" section of this article, and expand it as such. Once the two articles are merged I would also support keeping "sissy villain" as a redirect to this article, so that the term "sissy villain" can be used on various pages if needed. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 00:32, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||