Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 1,144:
:Deja vu anyone? <sup>[[User:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#6633cc>Khu</font>''']][[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#CC66FF>kri</font>''']]</sup> 19:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
::Indeed. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<
:I don't see how that's more serious or official than the present template; it just appears to be more verbose. [[User:Nufy8|Nufy8]] ([[User talk:Nufy8|talk]]) 19:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Line 1,177:
:Your version very quickly gets into "the response to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|malicious mischief]] is [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocking]] or [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning]] the vandal." It reads like a indirect threat to block, which I think is somewhat strong for a message which assumes good faith. If you want a template that reads more like a "warning against vandalism", use one of the higher level templates. --[[User talk:Charles Sturm|Sturm]] 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
::Chuck, you're aware that there are [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Warnings and notices|multiple levels of warnings]], right? This level 1 warning is appropriately worded to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and not [[WP:BITE|bite any new editors who simply made a mistake]]. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<
:Your points have been answered previously and you do not wish to engage in discussion. Re-raising the same old points will be given due attention they deserve. <sup>[[User:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#6633cc>Khu</font>''']][[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#CC66FF>kri</font>''']]</sup> 20:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
|