Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 31: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Category:Rivers named for women: delete |
|||
Line 105:
*'''Delete''' - This is categorization by name, a form of [[WP:OC|overcategorization]]. The rivers otherwise have little in common and should not be grouped together. [[User:Dr. Submillimeter|Dr. Submillimeter]] 14:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete and listify''' - Categorization by name, a bad idea. Where interesting and relevant lists are appropriate. (And I don't know what the POV is supposed to be (rivers named after women are better? worse? than rivers named after geographical features or men?), but honorary naming patterns ''are'' of interest--buildings for instance are largely named after men; Venusian craters after women; and so on. There's often some historical or cultural reason for naming patterns that is, actually, of use to scholars.) --[[User:Lquilter|lquilter]] 15:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Every other article in every other category only really has one thing in common. Thats the point of a category. So, I'll go with delete because of [[WP:OV]]. —[[User talk:Mikedk9109|<font color="crimson" face="Eras Demi ITC">'''mikedk9109'''</font>]]<sup>[[User:Mikedk9109/Autographs|<font color="black">'''''SIGN'''''</font></sup>]] 23:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
==== Category:Native fauna of Texas ====
| |||