Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project-based solutions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 26:
*'''Delete''' - Not a hoax. See [http://www.forrester.com/rb/Research/introducing_project-based_solutions/q/id/42255/t/2], and [http://www.clarizen.com/projectsoftware/project-solutions.html]. This is a concept coined by Forrester. However, there really doesn't seem to have been much coverage of this concept in reliable sources. I'm sure the consultants are sighing because if this had caught on, it looks like the sort of thing that would allow them to engage in sweet consulting gigs wherein they provide guidance and best practices to inject synergy and modern frameworks into legacy solutions through the evolutionary introduction of project based solutions software (or some such bafflegab). -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 18:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per nom. Couldn't say it better, Whpq! --
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||