Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Archive/Feb 2011: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Removing Guerre_14-18-Humour-L'ingordo,_trop_dur-1915.JPG; it has been deleted from Commons by Pi.1415926535 because: per [[:c:Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Eugen |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 735:
'''Graphist opinion(s):'''
{{Done}} What do you think? [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<
Wow, thanks!
Line 743:
*We need some "notches cut out" of the numbered scutes. Need people to see that the turtle is actually being disfigured. I'm thinking if you can pick one different number from each "quadrant", that would work best, so that I can describe the code in caption. Probably 8 and 7 on the bottom, and 2 and 3 on the top. But does not matter exactly.
: [[File:Turtle marking.svg|thumb|right|120px|See, no checkerboard!]] The checkerboard is just the default background for vector graphics that aren't set against anything. When you actually see the image in an article, it looks significantly less checkery. As for the notches, you'd like one notch each in Top Left 2, Top Right 3, Bottom Left 8, and Bottom Right 7? [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<
::Ahh...figured it was something like that on the chess board. Um...yes please on the notches. You can look at the original and see some (doesn't matter if they are triangle or square shaped notches, both are used) That's how they know what turtle it is 50 years later (literally a study has gone that long, and there was a turtle that old!)
::: Okay, top left 3 and bottom left 9 are scute'd. How's it look? [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<
::::I think it's good that you just clipped two (code 9,3-0,0). Please make the notches larger.[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 02:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
::::: Would you like me to put the code back in too? After glancing at the article, it seems important. [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<
::::::OK. Please write it as 9,3-0,0 though (better clarity). And put it closer to the shell (old version wastes too much space).[[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 05:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
::::::: How about now? Voila! [[User:Bobamnertiopsis|<
::::::::Perfect! Thanks for the extensive fiddling with such an image. Great addition to a great article! Love getting help from the experts!
|