Robson classification: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m top: clean up, typo(s) fixed: secton → section
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: doi-access, bibcode. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 594/990
Line 13:
#Single cephalic pregnancy, 36 weeks' gestation or less
 
The classification is increasingly used to monitor and compare rates of caesarean section in many countries, and some further subdivisions of the ten groups have been proposed.<ref name="pmid24892928">{{cite journal| author=Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR| title=A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. | journal=PLOS ONE | year= 2014 | volume= 9 | issue= 6 | pages= e97769 | pmid=24892928 | doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0097769 | pmc=4043665 | urlbibcode=https://www2014PLoSO.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom997769B | doi-access=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24892928 free }} </ref>
 
==References==