Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 2806:106E:B:EB8A:5812:FFA3:1BF4:BDDD - "→Introductory sentences are promotional, not NPOV: not publicity" |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 19:
This seems to be what happened. A handful of people — "Ideogram", "Lulu", "Mikademus"... — had apparently decided to teach me a lesson. I think this is inappropriate, and I ask other people interested in this article to help make sure that they don't again let their passions override concern for the quality of the article.
:No one tried to "teach you a lesson", Bertrand. That's as far from the truth as is easy to imagine. The fact you would state such a thing, to me, suggests you are nowhere close to ready to work on this article that is far too close to your personal emotions. In point of fact, you owe a gigantic apology to Wikipedia editors collectively for your truly obnoxious and uncooperative behavior. I strongly, strongly recommend that you simply stay away from this article, and use your writing skills and intelligence to some better endeavor.
::Would you please stop making these personal comments? This is not helping anyone. I had requested that my explanation be left as it is for coherence; I don't see why you can't be courteous and considerate.
Line 420:
</nowiki></pre>
If I have the keywords wrong, let me know to fix it. I'm not really sure what the rule is for where italics go (the article doesn't really say clearly), but presumably if I did it would be easy to add to the simple scaffolding.
:Please note that such a script will also only cover codeblocks, and not inline code. There is also, as you note, the issue of italics. [[User:Leland McInnes|Leland McInnes]] 05:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
| |||