Revision as of 21:29, 9 October 2021 edit Rray (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,856 edits →Legality: Doesn't really have anything to do with legality. Besides, it's unsourced and vague generalizations. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:29, 9 October 2021 edit undo Rray (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,856 edits m →Legality Next edit →
Line 13: ==Legality== In 2012, poker player [[Phil Ivey]] and partner Cheung Yin Sun won [[US$]]9.6 million playing [[Baccarat (card game)\|baccarat]] at the [[Borgata]] casino.<ref>{{cite news\|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/03/magazine/how-advantage-players-game-the-casinos.html\|title=How 'Advantage Players' Game the Casinos\|newspaper=The New York Times\|first=Michael\|last=Kaplan\|date=29 June 2016\|accessdate=29 August 2018}}</ref><ref name=CNN>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/13/us/casino-sues-poker-champ-phillip-ivey/ \|title=Atlantic City casino claims poker champ Phillip Ivey cheated to win $9.6 million \|publisher=[[CNN]] \|author=Haley Draznin and Sho Wills \|date=13 April 2014 \|accessdate=19 April 2014}}</ref> In April 2014, the Borgata filed a lawsuit against Ivey and Cheung for their winnings.<ref name=CNN/> In 2016, a Federal Judge ruled that Ivey and Cheung Yin Sun must repay US$10 million to the Borgata. U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman ruled that they did not commit fraud, but did breach their contract with the casino. He found that they did not abide by a New Jersey Casino Controls Act provision that prohibited marking cards. Although they did not mark the cards, they used tiny imperfections in the cards to gain an advantage.<ref>{{Cite news\|url=http://www.nj.com/atlantic/index.ssf/2016/12/poker_pro_phil_ivey_ordered_to_repay_10m_to_atlantic_city_casino.html\|title=Poker pro Phil Ivey ordered to repay $10M to Atlantic City casino\|newspaper=NJ.com\|access-date=20 December 2016}}</ref> Later in 2012 he was reported to have won £7.7 million (approx. $11 million) playing [[Baccarat (card game)#Punto banco\|punto banco]], a version of baccarat, at [[Crockfords (casino)\|Crockfords casino]] in London. Crockfords refunded his £1 million stake and agreed to send him his winnings, but ultimately refused payment.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/09/phil-ivey-poker-champion-_n_1951012.html\|title=Phil Ivey, Poker Champion, Denied $11.7 Million Payout From Punto Banco Card Game\|date=9 October 2012\|author=Ron Dicker\|publisher=[[Huffington Post]]}}</ref> Ivey sued them for payment, but lost in the UK [[High Court of Justice\|High Court]]; it was judged that the edge sorting was "cheating for the purpose of civil law".<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29543448\|title=Top poker player Phil Ivey loses £7.7m court battle\|date=8 October 2014\|publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref><ref name=Guardian/> It was accepted that Ivey and others genuinely considered that edge sorting was not cheating, and deemed immaterial that the casino could easily have protected itself. Critically, the judgment pointed out that Ivey had gained an advantage by actively using a croupier as his innocent agent, rather than taking advantage of an error or anomaly on the casino's part. Ivey appealed against the judgement but was unsuccessful.<ref>{{cite news\|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/nov/03/poker-player-loses-appeal-against-london-casino-over-77m-edge-sorting-win\|title=Poker player loses appeal against London casino over £7.7m winnings\|first=Nadia\|last=Khomami\|date=3 November 2016\|accessdate=29 August 2018}}</ref>

Edge sorting: Difference between revisions