Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 13:
#*Interestingly this user's first edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=59188295] admits sockpuppetry, and that he and [[User:Crisspy|Crisspy]] had created a joint account for the purposes of "revenge" against an admin. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 17:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I'd vote for Crisspy b/c he does 3 strikes instead of 1 strike.[[User:The mann hu new 2 much|The mann hu new 2 much]] 01:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
#* Note this vote is editors first edit. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>([[User_talk:Pgk|<
# ''' Strongest Possible Support''' I think Crisspy is incredibly eligible for admin. He did not realize that no campaigning is allowed, so that would explain the links that the opposing parties show. He gave strong answers to all of the questions, using the three-strike method for promising justice. He has dedicated a lot of his effort, work and time to wikipedia, and that's what makes a terrific, respectable admin. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Armando341|Armando341]] ([[User talk:Armando341|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Armando341|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>
#: '''Comment''' The fact that he did not realize he shouldn't campaign, shows he can't have read the [[WP:GRFA|Guide to RfA]] properly, as it clearly advises against it. If the candidate can't even nominate himself correctly, why should anyone have confidence he'll not abuse the admin tools inadvertently? [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 16:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support''' I have done some research, and Crisspy is just what we need for an admin: hardworking, respectful, dedicated, and intelligent. He will make sure that wikipedia stays in great condition, and he will deal with rulebreakers with justice and fairness. [[user:Mark ritzchkin|Mark ritzchkin]]
#* Note editor has < 50 edits and this is first edit in a month. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>([[User_talk:Pgk|<
#*Also an alleged member of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=59188295 joint account] with users 'sed and Crisspy. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 17:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Line 23:
#'''Strongest Possible Oppose''' - not listed properly on the main RFA page, weak answer to question 1, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Keithgreer&curid=2101852&diff=65161165&oldid=64118571 spamming user talk pages] with this RFA, general inexperience (only 267 mainspace edits, oldest one at 31 March 2006), odd three-strike proposal which demonstrates lack of basic understanding of existing warning policies and practices. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 05:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=65225155&oldid=65188943 Malformed] nomination. [[User:Naconkantari|<font color="red">Nacon</font><font color="gray">'''kantari'''</font>]] 16:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' inexperience as demonstrated by malformed nom. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>([[User_talk:Pgk|<
#* Additionally edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACrisspy&diff=51804646&oldid=51804400 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Night_Gyr&diff=prev&oldid=57648519 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=57433846 this] and creation of attack articles such as [[ACAR club]] (since deleted) --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]<sup>([[User_talk:Pgk|<
#'''Oppose''' per ESkog. --<span style="background:gold;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">S</span>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</span>[[User talk:Siva1979|<sup style="background:yellow;">Talk to me</sup>]] 16:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose''' sorry, but if you can't follow the instructions to correctly list your RfA, I have no confidence in your abilities to correctly use the mop. The campaigning for your RfA is also a bad idea and you edit count is too low for me to support you. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 16:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
| |||