Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very high-level programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Very high-level programming language]]: Strong Keep |
|||
Line 15:
*'''Weak keep''', the term seems really pointless and arbitrary compared to other high level languages, but apparently has been used in academia. [[User:Krimpet|Krimpet]] 01:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' More examples: [[SETL]] and [[ProSet]]. Google Books is ''awash'' with references on this topic [http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Very+High+Level+Languages%22&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0], it's a shame the nominator didn't do a little basic research before declaring a notable topic "blatant bullshit". If you disagree with one statement, then remove it or request a citation. As it happens, you're wrong - there is no reason why parsable natural language syntax cannot be used as as a programming language with a clever enough compiler or interpreter. --[[User:Canley|Canley]] 05:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
*Obvious '''keep'''. You can't say that VHLL don't exist or aren't notable when the ACM has a symposium on them!--[[User:OinkOink|OinkOink]] 06:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
| |||