Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
←Nuova pagina: == History == Generative art increasing popularity was due, in part, to the new computational and algorithmic possibilities offered via computers, which gave generative... |
Nessun oggetto della modifica |
||
Riga 9:
[[Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature#%20ftnref4|[4]]] Taylor, 6. Taylor is citing Paul Brown from Preston, “Art Ex Machina.”
== Controversy ==
Despite the loose parameters for what qualifies as art today, the debatable literary status of algorithmic outputs has been an ongoing contention even amongst new media artists. Digital technology theorist Yuk Hui called algorithmic outputs “algorithmic catastrophes” rather than anything worth studying at all, defining outputs, or “the product of automated algorithms,” as “the failure of reason,” not even “material failure.”[[Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature#%20ftn1|[1]]] Portuguese experimental poet Rui Torres, whose corpus of creative works includes presenting poetry in hypermedia contexts, asserted, while fielding questions after a talk delivered at the University of California, Berkeley in April 2016,[[Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature#%20ftn2|[2]]] that algorithmic outputs can never transpierce the literary realm, thus barring algorithmic outputs as literature and siding with Hui’s idea that algorithmic behaviors suggest a “failure of reason.”
[[Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature#%20ftnref1|[1]]] Hui, 123.
[[Utente:Lydia Tuan/Generative Literature#%20ftnref2|[2]]] Torres, “Unlocking the Secret Garden.”
== Examples of Generative Literature ==
<br />
| |||