Revision as of 11:22, 15 July 2021 edit 146.115.133.92 (talk) →The 2004 OSRM study Tag: Visual edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:07, 27 October 2021 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,863,217 edits Add: authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by BrownHairedGirl \| Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links \| #UCB_webform_linked 225/722 Next edit →
Line 49: \|url = http://www.osriskmanagement.com/press_releases/press_release_080204.pdf \|title = OSRM PR: Results of First-Ever Linux Patent Review Announced ~~\|format = PDF~~ \|url-status = dead \|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080703214013/http://www.osriskmanagement.com/press_releases/press_release_080204.pdf Line 60 ⟶ 59: not yet court-validated software patents that, if upheld as valid by the courts, could potentially be used to support patent claims against Linux. </blockquote>However, [[Mark Webbink]], who was Red Hat's Deputy General Counsel, said that Ravicher did not deduce the kernel to infringe any of said patents.<ref>{{Cite web\|~~last~~last1=September 20\|~~first~~first1=Mark Vernon in Open Source on\|last2=2005\|last3=Pst\|first3=12:00 Am\|title=Are potential legal liabilities holding back Linux adoption?\|url=https://www.techrepublic.com/article/are-potential-legal-liabilities-holding-back-linux-adoption/\|access-date=2021-07-15\|website=TechRepublic\|language=en}}</ref> ==Techniques for opposing patents==

Software patents and free software: Difference between revisions