Weierstrass factorization theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Replaced a slightly vague description by more choice of words (hopefully).
Line 14:
where {{math|''a''}} is a non-zero constant and {{math|''c''<sub>''n''</sub>}} are the zeroes of {{math|''p''}}.
 
The two forms of the Weierstrass factorization theorem can be thought of as extensions of the above to entire functions. The necessity of extraadditional machineryterms in the product is demonstrated when one considers the product <math>\,\prod_n (z-c_n)</math>, ifwhere the sequence <math>\{c_n\}</math> is not [[finite set|finite]]. It can never define an entire function, because the [[infinite product]] does not converge. Thus one cannot, in general, define an entire function from a sequence of prescribed zeroes or represent an entire function by its zeroes using the expressions yielded by the fundamental theorem of algebra.
 
A necessary condition for convergence of the infinite product in question is that for each z, the factors <math> (z-c_n) </math> must approach 1 as <math>n\to\infty</math>. So it stands to reason that one should seek a function that could be 0 at a prescribed point, yet remain near 1 when not at that point and furthermore introduce no more zeroes than those prescribed.